Pets vs Cattle Analogy in Infrastructure Management
The “pets vs cattle” analogy is a way to describe two different approaches to managing servers or infrastructure.
Pets
- Definition: Individual machines treated as unique and irreplaceable.
- Characteristics:
- Each has a distinct name (e.g. web-server-1, db-primary).
- If one fails, you fix it manually (apply patches, reboot, troubleshoot).
- Custom configurations are common.
- Scaling is limited and slower due to manual care.
- Typical Use Cases:
- Legacy systems.
- Highly specialised workloads that can’t be easily replicated.
Cattle
- Definition: Large numbers of essentially identical machines that are disposable and interchangeable.
- Characteristics:
- Machines are numbered or automatically named (e.g. server-001, server-002).
- If one fails, it’s terminated and replaced automatically.
- Configuration and deployment are automated.
- Scaling is fast and horizontal.
- Typical Use Cases:
- Cloud-native applications.
- Container orchestration platforms.
- Auto-scaling environments.
Why It Matters
Moving from pets to cattle:
- Reduces operational overhead.
- Improves reliability and consistency.
- Enables rapid scaling and recovery.
- Aligns with infrastructure-as-code and immutable deployment practices.
In short, “pets” require care and attention, whereas “cattle” can be replaced without disruption. This mindset shift is key to modern infrastructure management.
Share on X (Twitter) Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook