Pets vs Cattle Analogy in Infrastructure Management
The “pets vs cattle” analogy is a way to describe two different approaches to managing servers or infrastructure.
Pets
- Definition: Individual machines treated as unique and irreplaceable.
 - Characteristics:
 - Each has a distinct name (e.g. web-server-1, db-primary).
 - If one fails, you fix it manually (apply patches, reboot, troubleshoot).
 - Custom configurations are common.
 - Scaling is limited and slower due to manual care.
 - Typical Use Cases:
 - Legacy systems.
 - Highly specialised workloads that can’t be easily replicated.
 
Cattle
- Definition: Large numbers of essentially identical machines that are disposable and interchangeable.
 - Characteristics:
 - Machines are numbered or automatically named (e.g. server-001, server-002).
 - If one fails, it’s terminated and replaced automatically.
 - Configuration and deployment are automated.
 - Scaling is fast and horizontal.
 - Typical Use Cases:
 - Cloud-native applications.
 - Container orchestration platforms.
 - Auto-scaling environments.
 
Why It Matters
Moving from pets to cattle:
- Reduces operational overhead.
 - Improves reliability and consistency.
 - Enables rapid scaling and recovery.
 - Aligns with infrastructure-as-code and immutable deployment practices.
 
In short, “pets” require care and attention, whereas “cattle” can be replaced without disruption. This mindset shift is key to modern infrastructure management.
Share on X (Twitter) Share on LinkedIn Share on Facebook